(I like playing the Devil's Advocate.) I believe from their location in the PT that C and Si should have very different chemical properties! The chemistry of the first member of the group 14, 15, 16 elements are so different from the second and subsequent members of the group that in virtually every chem text the chemistry of C, N and O is considered separately, from Si,Ge,Sn,Pb (group 14), P,As,Sb, Bi (group 15) and S,Se,Te (group 16). The heavier elements of these groups are similar.
Yes, you can make SiH4 and SiCl4 analogous to CH4 (natural gas) and CCl4 (use to be used as nonflammable solvent) but SiH4 ignites in air and SiCl4 reacts instantly with H2O in air to give choking white fumes of HCl and SiO2.
Carbon has the unique ability for catenation: the ability to form strong element-element (where would we be without it). Some cmpds with Si-Si-Si-Si bonds are known but they are both kinetically unstable (readily react with O2 to give O-Si-O-Si-) and thermodynamically unstable (less AO overlap).
C atoms can get in close to another C, N or O to form pπ-pπ double bonds (C=C, C=N, C=O). Some cmpds with Si=Si bonds are known but they are unstable; I believe that no stable cmpd with a Si=O is known (think about this, and cmpds such as benzene C6H6 and phenyl groups in organic cmpds; graphite).
On the other hand, Si has low energy 3d AOs that it can involve in bonding (rare but [SiF6]^2- forms when glass, SiO2, dissolves in HF). These AOs also provide low energy routes for rxn (Fukui frontier concept).
Conclusion: the similarities of the chemistry of C and Si are superficial.